Dec
16
2009
0

Youth Sit-In at COP15!

Since 5pm, a group of approximately 20 youth from across the globe started a sit-in inside of the Bella Center outside of the Plenary and continue to stay put. They are reading the names of 12 million people who want a fair and just climate treaty as well as transparency in the process. Among them, my friend Lisa Curtis.

Sen. John Kerry passed by and greeted the youth sitting-in as well as other delegates.

Please help spread the word. Let the whole world know we want real long-term solutions!

Live stream: http://www.powershift09.org/live

Videos by Sustain Us

UPDATE:
UN security told youth that if they do not leave now, then they will be arrested and civil society will not be allowed to come into the building Thursday or Friday. Group has agreed to walk out to allow the few civil society has been guaranteed for Thursday and Friday.

Statement will be delivered outside.

Dec
16
2009
0

Reclaim Power: The People’s Assembly

With access restricted to NGOs, no transparency in the UN negotiations, absurd emission target proposals that would rise emissions to 770ppm by the year 2100, and two decades of people organizing for environmental justice, the people took it to the streets…and to Bella Center!
Chanting “Reclaim Power,” hundreds of people from all over the world participated in this action to send the message to the UN and the World that real solutions are not discussed in the climate negotiations and the people are completely left out of the process.

Even though some NGOs were given the secondary badge to access the Bella Center today, Friends of the Earth were denied access to the center without any given reason. They sat in for two hours by registration and credentials desk until Yvo de Boer came by and said he wouldn’t listen to them until they act civilized and stop insulting him.

Quiet honestly, the ones that need to be civilized are the ones negotiating our future! There is nothing civilized about letting small island states submerge in water or allowing the continuation of emissions that not only harm the environment but also public health.

The people are fed up with the injustice and want long-term solutions not false solutions that continue to increase the gap between the rich and poor.

Unfortunately, I was not able to attend the UN negotiations because access was further restricted despite the fact that I have the proper accreditation and second badge. However, I did ride the train with Kat and Brenna and got off one stop down from Bella Center. We got a great view of the Reclaim the Power action and I got footage of it. We rode the train about four times…trying to figure out what to do next since we couldn’t enter Bella Center and the Reclaim the Power action was blocked by approximately 20 police vans/busses from all sides. During those four rides, we took pictures and video of the action.

Check it out: Reclaim Power! The People’s Assembly

(I will try posting a high quality version of this soon. Pardon the awful pixels for the meantime).

Video from the inside of Bella Center
by TreehuggerTV

Other videos of Reclaim Power action
by naturerights

by CYDCopenhagen

Dec
15
2009
0

Youth let down not once, but twice!

With tension building up in all directions at COP15, access to the center is being reduced to NGOs Tuesday and Wednesday, 1000 civil society members on Thursday and only 90 on Friday. Additionally, the G77 walked out of negotiations at noon yesterday causing a suspension. With that being said, I was eager to ask Yvo de Boer and Connie Hedegaard what they thought about G77 suspending the negotiations. What are the next steps? I also wanted to take the opportunity to ask a question in regards to why there is no international talk and action taken in regards to Climate Change and public health?

Due to last week’s experience waiting in line to enter the room for a high-level meeting with Yvo de Boer, I was determined to arrive early outside the room to secure a good seat for filming and was lucky that I was the first in line since a big crowd down the hall was going CRAZY over Al Gore walking by. Thankfully, I did not have to deal with the claustrophobic feeling of being shoved into the room by people behind me since security organized entrance better than previous events. I had the perfect seat at the front and was ready with my video camera to record the meeting especially since Linh Do, a fellow UNEP TUNZA youth advisory council representative for Australia was chosen to moderate the meeting.

The plan was for a 30 minute meeting. 15 minutes passed by and many youth in the room started to get concerned. 5 minutes later a UN staff member told us that Yvo De Boer and Connie Hedegaard were running late and still in a meeting. Finally, the UN staff member received a call notifying her to cancel the event. I understand that an unexpected walk out by G77 countries occurred at the negotiations, but if they both had to meet, strategize, and resolve the dilemma in negotiations, they should have sent someone to notify UN staff to cancel the meeting before so many youth went out of their way to wait in line and attend this high level meeting.

I was not too upset about this yesterday. However, today I got an email from the UNFCCC secretariat stating that the high level meeting with Ban Ki-Moon was rescheduled to Thursday evening! First of all, who will even get to this meeting with further access restricted for NGOs that day. It is almost guaranteed that no one in our delegation will have access on Thursday, much less on Friday. Additionally, the majority of Youth will not be in attendance. How does UNFCCC plan to distribute the secondary badges aka “yellow badges” amongst NGOs? Why are they doing this in the first place? Perhaps, due to security reasons and heads of state arriving. However, having 90 civil society members on Friday is just unacceptable! That is not being transparent at all. It is being exclusive. This is not a conference for the people. It is more a conference about economic benefit than it is about paying an ecological debt, human rights. In short: Money>People. Throughout COP15, the admiration of youth organizing kept being highlighted with comments from high level figures such as “inspirational youth” or “It’s great to see a large number of youth involved here.” However, they fail to understand our message that we want a strong deal with 350ppm and human rights included in the text. We do not need to be complimented on how great youth organizers we are. What we need is for them to act with us.

Dec
10
2009
0

I stand with Tuvalu!

At the negotiations yesterday, the island of Tuvalu, which is a small pacific island state proposed a new protocol that would require countries to reduce emissions to at least 350ppm, which is the most amount of CO2 that the earth can resist and lessen climate catastrophe. China reacted negatively to the proposal, which caused Tuvalu to suspend negotiations. If countries do not commit to reduce emissions to at least 350ppm, Tuvalu will not survive as it is currently on a tight rope. Tuvalu is at 1 meter above sea level. Tuvalu and other island states have contributed and supported developed countries in their wars. However, they do not want to reciprocate support to help fight climate change. Suppose a 350ppm global legal binding agreement is NOT set, where will these people go for refuge? I think this could lead to further social injustice if countries do not extend their help right now and do something about it. Imagine being a citizen of Tuvalu, you immigrate to a different country because your island was destroyed due to climate catastrophe. Will you be given hospitality or will you be labeled an illegal alien? Will you be treated well or oppressed? I do not know the answers. However, I challenge negotiators to answer my questions.

I stand with Tuvalu!

Dec
09
2009
0

Africa reacts to the Infamous “Danish Text” with Protest

The Infamous “Danish Text” also known as the “Copenhagen Agreement” leaked into UK’s The Guardian Newspaper yesterday and caused a great stir of concern amongst developing countries.

What would the Danish Text do?
1. Developing countries would be forced to follow emission cuts not included in the original UN agreement
2. Creates a new category called “the most vulnerable”, creating more divide among poor countries.
3. Weakens UN role as the authority in climate financing matters
4. Does not allow poor countries to emit more than 1.44 tons of carbon per person but allows richer countries to emit 2.67 tons of carbon per person.

1.44 does not equal 2.67. That will not be a just treaty.

We need to focus on human impact and place ethics before profits. Survival is not negotiable!

Assembled by Flying Squirrel Adventures | Clean Air | Clean Water | A 1000 Skwirls working for environmental justice